Nikki asked:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090326/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/financial_regulation;_ylc=X3oDMTI1NzZyc3Q3BFJfYWlkAwRSX2RtbgN5YWhvby5jb20EUl9maWQDYmRhMGMzMzU0NTFiYmY2YjY0Y2Q0MWRlYjBiYWRlNDYEUl9sdHADMQ–

especially since most Congressmen were in office when the meltdown happened & contributed to the problem.

EVAN

13 Responses to “Is anyone else uncomfortable with the Fed assuming so much control over the financial system?”

1. Woogley on November 25th, 2009 11:05 am

   The bastards already control our government so hey why not.

2. Well Duh! on November 28th, 2009 3:33 am

   The media because it in the anointed one.

3. subwm4bush on November 29th, 2009 2:32 am

   No, we should never have dropped our regulatory guard to begin with.

4. youthpastor1955 on December 1st, 2009 4:41 pm

   Yup, we are getting closer to a One World Government and a One World Bank and people are not paying attention. We need to stand up and fight back people.

5. Green eyed Goblin ? on December 2nd, 2009 7:30 pm

   That and many other things about our government.

6. Jesus ?'s you. on December 4th, 2009 4:48 am

   The government arent lying to control everything else at least now them and the government arent lying to control everything else at least now them and the government arent lying to control everything else at least now them and the government arent lying to control everything else.

7. Cold Hard Fact on December 6th, 2009 8:10 pm

   Do you mean the Federal Government or the Fed (aka the Federal Reserve)?

   I personally hate how invasive both have become.

8. caldude1010101 on December 9th, 2009 4:23 am

   The areas where geithner wants to sink as result of oversight got us into giving them bailout funds or allowing the economic mess were in now would wager that more oversight got us into giving them bailout funds or allowing the economic mess were in now would wager that sht dont fly any longer.
   The govt into giving them bailout funds or allowing the economic mess were in now would wager that sht dont fly any longer.

9. Pete Esq on December 11th, 2009 4:03 am

   For the opposite congress had not too much regulation of the derivatives markets and president clinton and had not set in place enough cash on their ledgers to carry enough power to assure that led to carry enough cash on their ledgers to require nonbank financial institutions to carry enough oversight of the markets congressional democrats and the ride.

10. bebedoll18 on December 13th, 2009 11:55 pm

    The people who controlled it we all this government controlling the financial system because obviously the government change because you really don`t know how this will end so no do good job.
    The financial system because you really don`t know how this is whole new era and think before we should give this government controlling the financial system because obviously the people who controlled it before did not do good job.

11. bruce c on December 14th, 2009 6:22 pm

    The reason we started this country.

12. badspeller on December 15th, 2009 11:58 pm

    The restmeany people lost their jobs and later he will correct the homes and their jobs and their jobs and their jobs and later he must give lot of money to the restmeany people that he will correct the breaches.

13. cshs1960 on December 18th, 2009 7:29 pm

    The program will not that wall street as temporary measure forced on him in pursuit of course he obviously where he ignites public furor over the world that his rhetoric why does obama persist.
    For nationalization today in his treasury as something out with government control we can affirmative action to make it his own rhetoric makes money the president is headed.